Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Back in August, I posted a photo from the Republican National Convention illustrating how the mere juxtaposition of two phrases can set up a meaning that no one intended to convey. For partisan balance, here's an example (below) of how the same unintended meaning (okay, one supposes it was unintended) can result from the juxtaposition of a speaker's words with her own gestures. The speaker is Jill Biden, wife of Vice President Joe Biden. What's interesting as well here is how, once this meaning is set up, the speaker's subsequent words must inevitably be understood within the context of the original unintended meaning, a fact that makes it very hard for the speaker, her husband, and the audience to keep from laughing both at what they're hearing and at the prospect of yet more unintended double entendres. One take-away from both this video and the earlier convention photo is that meaning itself is more social than we often suppose. It's common to think of meaning as residing inside consciousness — that of the speaker (or writer) or that of the listener (or reader). But in both these cases, meaning seems to reside outside both: in the shared understanding of certain words and gestures and in the shared practice of treating juxtaposition as itself a source of meaning. (H/t for the video to my in-law and facebook friend Rick Goldfarb.)


  1. Unknown User (mrb21)

    It's also interesting how, after that first gesture leads the crowd to innuendo, every other statement she says falls under scrutiny for sexual meaning. It's like once the first joke is made, the audience seeks to turn everything else she says into something of the similar strain. That's just an interesting note on how the human mind constantly looks for patterns, I think.

  2. Unknown User (kv2)

    it is so funny how we can make something as serious as a reelection into sexual humor.  She played it off very well i believe.  It could of went downhill from there, but she kept her cool.